/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.quackometer.net | ||
| | | | |
www.dcscience.net
|
|
| | | | | Jump to the homeopathy debate Jump to follow-up: Brian Kaplan Obama wins! Bush and Blair have gone. Could this mark the beginning of the end of the fashion for believing things that aren't tr... | |
| | | | |
jdc325.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | [BPSDB] What is chiropractic anyway? The Wiki page on Chiropractic is OK and gives details of the history, philosophy, regulation and effectiveness (or otherwise) of chiropractic. Highlights include these gems: "Although vaccination is one of the most cost-effective forms of prevention against infectious disease, it remains controversial within the chiropractic community. Most chiropractic writings on... | |
| | | | |
apgaylard.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Reviewing the slides of Lionel Milgrom's recent lecture at the "Scientific Research in Homeopathy" conference shows how low he is prepared to go to construct his fantasy of the "New Fundamentalists". Marvel at the logical fallacies, mis-quotations and mis-understandings. | |
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The text presents a debate over the historical use of homeopathy by notable figures like Charles Darwin, with Dana Ullman asserting that Darwin's physician, Dr. James Manby Gully, was a homeopath and that Darwin benefited from his treatments. Ullman provides references from Gully's book, claiming that Gully endorsed homeopathy and that Darwin's health improved significantly under his care. However, HCN and Mojo challenge these claims, questioning the evidence and pointing out that Gully's practice was primarily hydropathy, not homeopathy. The discussion also touches on the current use of homeopathy, with concerns about its efficacy and potential risks to patients. The overall tone is contentious, with both sides presenting arguments and countera... | ||
