Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
apgaylard.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the efficacy and historical context of homeopathy, particularly in relation to Charles Darwin's health. Critics argue that the evidence for homeopathy's effectiveness is anecdotal and lacks scientific validation, while proponents highlight historical cases like Darwin's supposed recovery as proof of its efficacy. The debate touches on issues of medical science, anecdotal evidence, and the reliability of historical diagnoses. The conversation also includes critiques of the peer-review process and the dissemination of information on alternative medicine. | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Mike Zajko This post addresses an issue that has been coming up recurrently since the start of this blog. I hope it might be a way to step back and reflect on the nature of science in general, as ... Continue reading ? | |
| | | | |
www.dcscience.net
|
|
| | | | | Jump to the homeopathy debate Jump to follow-up: Brian Kaplan Obama wins! Bush and Blair have gone. Could this mark the beginning of the end of the fashion for believing things that aren't tr... | |
| | | | |
theconversation.com
|
|
| | | Today we are launching Equivac® HeV, the world's first commercially available Hendra vaccine for horses. This breakthrough is the culmination of a scientific journey that dates back to the emergence of... | ||
