Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
apgaylard.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
hawk-handsaw.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | Shang et al. recently published a meta-analysis comparing homeopathy with 'conventional' treatments in the Lancet (Lancet 366; 726-732). Thi... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Mike Zajko This post addresses an issue that has been coming up recurrently since the start of this blog. I hope it might be a way to step back and reflect on the nature of science in general, as ... Continue reading ? | |
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the efficacy and historical context of homeopathy, particularly in relation to Charles Darwin's health. Critics argue that the evidence for homeopathy's effectiveness is anecdotal and lacks scientific validation, while proponents highlight historical cases like Darwin's supposed recovery as proof of its efficacy. The debate touches on issues of medical science, anecdotal evidence, and the reliability of historical diagnoses. The conversation also includes critiques of the peer-review process and the dissemination of information on alternative medicine. | |
| | | | |
www.healthcarefinancenews.com
|
|
| | | Optum calls the study's conclusions "misleading" as health systems use many data elements other than cost to select patients for clinical engagement. | ||
