|
You are here |
hawk-handsaw.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the efficacy and historical context of homeopathy, particularly in relation to Charles Darwin's health. Critics argue that the evidence for homeopathy's effectiveness is anecdotal and lacks scientific validation, while proponents highlight historical cases like Darwin's supposed recovery as proof of its efficacy. The debate touches on issues of medical science, anecdotal evidence, and the reliability of historical diagnoses. The conversation also includes critiques of the peer-review process and the dissemination of information on alternative medicine. | |
| | | | |
www.dcscience.net
|
|
| | | | | Jump to follow-up | |
| | | | |
jdc325.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The SoH Controversy The SoH (The Society of Homeopaths) has done something rather silly. They've made legal threats over a blog post that points out (quite truthfully) that they do not effectively regulate their members. This has been highlighted on many sites now, but blogger Gimpy has taken the ball and run with it. This... | |
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | |||