Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.theverge.com | ||
| | | | |
open-web-advocacy.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] Open Web Advocacy criticizes Apple's compliance proposal for the EU's Digital Markets Act as insufficient, arguing it fails to allow third-party browsers to compete fairly on iOS regarding engine choice, web app functionality, and API access. | |
| | | | |
mjtsai.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text discusses Apple's response to the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), focusing on the Core Technology Fee (CTF) and its implications. Key points include: 1. Apple's compliance with the DMA involves introducing the CTF, a fee based on app downloads, which critics argue is a disguised tax on developers. 2. The CTF is seen as a way for Apple to maintain revenue while appearing to comply with regulations. 3. Developers, especially indie creators, are critical of the fee, arguing it disproportionately affects smaller developers and stifles innovation. 4. The text highlights the broader debate over tech monopolies and regulatory responses, with some suggesting the EU could impose stricter penalties on Apple. 5. There is also mention of alternativ... | |
| | | | |
formularsumo.co.uk
|
|
| | | | | Apple & Google at the EU DMA compliance workshops, June 2025. | |
| | | | |
theplatformlaw.blog
|
|
| | | In November last year, the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) started a market investigation into the supply of web browsers and browser engines on mobile devices, and the distribution of cloud gaming services through app stores on mobile devices. However, Apple appealed the CMA's decision to make a market investigation reference (MIR) in the ... Continue reading Into Uncharted Waters - Making sense of the CAT's Apple/CMA judgment ? | ||
