/explore
|
You are here 
|
infrequently.org | ||
| | | | |
www.manton.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The author criticizes Apple's compliance with the EU's Digital Markets Act, arguing that the company is using the legislation to maintain control over app distribution and browser engines, rather than genuinely supporting developers and users. | |
| | | | |
open-web-advocacy.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] Open Web Advocacy criticizes Apple's compliance proposal for the EU's Digital Markets Act as insufficient, arguing it fails to allow third-party browsers to compete fairly on iOS regarding engine choice, web app functionality, and API access. | |
| | | | |
theplatformlaw.blog
|
|
| | | | | Yesterday, Apple made an important announcement regarding changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union in response to the Digital Markets Act ("DMA"). This announcement covers a lot of ground and should be read in parallel with a number of accompanying documents. In this blog post, I discuss my first (and ... Continue reading When Apple takes the European Commission for fools: An initial overview of Apple's new terms and conditions for iOS app distribution in the EU | |
| | | | |
mjtsai.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] A federal judge ruled that Google violated US antitrust law by maintaining a monopoly in the search and advertising markets through practices like paying companies to be the default search engine. The ruling, led by Judge Amit Mehta, highlights how these payments incentivize companies like Apple to avoid competing with Google, thus preserving Google's dominance. The case now moves to determining remedies, with potential changes to the search market and antitrust enforcement. | ||
