/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.jdmoyer.com | ||
| | | | |
www.spencergreenberg.com
|
|
| | | | | At what step do you stop agreeing with this logical argument relating to animals? For each step, I'm also showing the percentage of disagreements on social media that involved this step (eith... | |
| | | | |
evanfields.net
|
|
| | | | | Since roughly 2009, I've wrestled daily with how to be a moral eater. My thoughts and uncertainties have evolved over time, so as both a time capsule for myself and an exercise in writing-clarifies-thinking, I thought I'd jot down my current status. | |
| | | | |
www.steelsnowflake.org
|
|
| | | | | Our views of animal ethics in philosophy fall under three broad but distinct strands of thought: a Cartesian, a Kantian, and a Darwinian. All three co-exist uneasily in society today. This essay looks at how these interact with each other in the modern world and what it means for how we view the world and the animals in it. | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | "If the ends don't justify the means, what does?" -variously attributed "I think of myself as running on hostile hardware." -Justin Corwin Yesterday I talked about how humans may have evolved a structure of political revolution, beginning by believing themselves morally superior to the corrupt current power structure, but ending by being corrupted by power themselves-not by any plan in their own minds, but by the echo of ancestors who did the same and thereby reproduced. | ||
