|
You are here |
www.hedweb.com | ||
| | | | |
www.biointelligence-explosion.com
|
|
| | | | | Do biological minds have a future? | |
| | | | |
magnusvinding.com
|
|
| | | | | The following is a point-by-point critique of Lukas Gloor's essay Altruists Should Prioritize Artificial Intelligence. My hope is that this critique will serve to make it clear - to Lukas, myself, and others - where and why I disagree with this line of argument, and thereby hopefully also bring some relevant considerations to the table... | |
| | | | |
www.abolitionist.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text presents a vision for a cruelty-free world through the abolition of suffering, advocating for the use of advanced biotechnology, infotechnology, and nanotechnology to reprogram the source code of nature. It emphasizes the feasibility of this goal, suggesting that the challenges of reprogramming non-human animals are less complex than those of humans. The text also highlights the need for academic research and political action to transition from the current status quo to a compassionate ecosystem. It references religious principles such as Ahimsa and the concept of stewardship, suggesting that these can support the abolitionist project. The text concludes with a call to action for compassion and responsibility in shaping a better future. | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | The strategy-stealing assumption posits that for any strategy an unaligned AI could use to influence the long-term future, there is an analogous stra... | ||