Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
www.alignmentforum.org
|
|
| | | | | AI researchers warn that advanced machine learning systems may develop their own internal goals that don't match what we intended. This "mesa-optimiz... | |
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
|
|
| | | | | I have some exciting news (for me, anyway). Starting next week, I'll be going on leave from UT Austin for one year, to work at OpenAI. They're the creators of the astonishing GPT-3 and DALL-E2, which have not only endlessly entertained me and my kids, but recalibrated my understanding of what, for better and worse,... | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | I dislike most AI risk analogies that I've seen people use. While I think analogies can be helpful for explaining concepts to people and illustrating mental pictures, I think they are frequently misused, and often harmful. At the root of the problem is that analogies are consistently mistaken for, and often deliberately intended as arguments for particular AI risk positions. And a large fraction of the time[1] when analogies are used this way, I think they are misleading and imprecise, routinely conveying the false impression of a specific, credible model of AI, even when no such credible model exists. | |
| | | | |
www.alignmentforum.org
|
|
| | | I've written a draft report evaluating a version of the overall case for existential risk from misaligned AI, and taking an initial stab at quantifyi... | ||
