/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.alignmentforum.org | ||
| | | | |
blog.redwoodresearch.org
|
|
| | | | | An initial narrow proposal | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | I sometimes hear people asking: "What is the plan for avoiding a catastrophe from misaligned AI?" ... | |
| | | | |
www.cold-takes.com
|
|
| | | | | Hypothetical stories where the world tries, but fails, to avert a global disaster. | |
| | | | |
opentheory.net
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The text presents a critique of the Foundational Research Institute's (FRI) approach to defining and addressing suffering and s-risks, with a focus on the philosophical and metaphysical challenges of functionalism. The author, Mike Johnson, argues that FRI's reliance on functionalism leads to intractable problems, such as the inability to provide a clear, disagreement-mediating definition of suffering. He outlines several objections to FRI's position, including the ineffability of suffering, intuition duels, convergence requirements, and the mapping of consciousness to physical systems. Johnson suggests that FRI should consider alternative frameworks, such as computational hierarchies, to address these issues. The text also references various so... | ||
