/explore
|
You are here 
|
ukconstitutionallaw.org | ||
| | | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | | | | Download this article here:IntroductionThis articlecritically discusses the judgmentin For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for itbe accessible to non-lawyers and to lawyers of all specialisms. The articleis not intended to be comprehensive in its critique of the judgment but focuseson three points:1. The implications of the Court declining to considerunder section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998whether its interpretation would breach t | |
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
|
|
| | | | | By Mark Elliott and Nicholas Kilford In the Continuity Bill Reference, the Supreme Court advanced a striking analysis of the implications for devolution of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty - or, more specifically, of the provision in the Scotland Act 1998 that had hitherto been understood merely to affirm that doctrine. The provision in question... | |
| | | | |
dissidentvoice.org
|
|
| | | | | Faramarz Farbod: You have taught at Princeton University for four decades; you were the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in Israel (2008-2014); and you are the author of numerous books about global issues and international law. In preparation for this conversation, I have been reading your autobiography, Public Intellectual: | |
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
|
|
| | | Sponsored by the Clark Foundation for Legal Education and the UK Constitutional Law Association Thirty Years of Judicial Review in Scotland 26 January 2015 10 am to 4.30 pm University of Strathclyde, Court/Senate Suite, Collins Building, 22 Richmond St, Glasgow This one day conference is being held jointly by Glasgow and Strathclyde University Law... | ||
