/explore
|
You are here 
|
notageni.us | ||
| | | | |
www.law.cornell.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text presents a legal analysis of the constitutionality of the independent counsel statute, focusing on the separation of powers and executive authority. The Supreme Court examines whether the statute's provisions, particularly the 'good cause' removal standard and the special court's appointment authority, violate the President's constitutional duty to ensure the faithful execution of the laws. The Court considers precedents such as *Humphrey's Executor* and *Wiener* to determine whether the independent counsel, an inferior officer, is subject to removal restrictions that impede the President's executive power. The analysis concludes that the statute does not unduly interfere with the President's constitutional obligations, as the 'good cau... | |
| | | | |
www.cyberleagle.com
|
|
| | | | | The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). This is the case in which a small Canadian t... | |
| | | | |
www.chrisritchie.org
|
|
| | | | | Highlights from Trump v Anderson oral arguments. | |
| | | | |
www.whitehouse.gov
|
|
| | | By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose. | ||
