Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
notageni.us | ||
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
|
|
| | | | | Constitutional lawyers often point to key cases as milestones in public law. Recently, the Supreme Court decision in Privacy International joined the ranks of leading public law cases, adding to the cases discussing ouster clauses and the extent to which courts can review decisions of inferior courts and tribunals in Anisminic and Cart. As Privacy... | |
| | | | |
www.chrisritchie.org
|
|
| | | | | Highlights from Trump v Anderson oral arguments. | |
| | | | |
inforrm.org
|
|
| | | | | Mr Justice Mann's judgment in Sir Cliff Richard's claim against the BBC ([2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch)) was the biggest media law story of the week (and, indeed, of the year so far). | |
| | | | |
lemire.me
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article discusses the limitations of peer review in science, using historical and contemporary examples to argue that it is not the gold standard. It highlights cases where peer review may suppress innovative or controversial ideas, such to the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2. The piece critiques the suppression of dissenting views and the role of funding and institutional pressures in shaping scientific discourse. It concludes that science should be open and progressive, with peer review being a tool rather than a gatekeeping mechanism. | ||
