Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
osc.centerforopenscience.org | ||
| | | | |
michaelschoon.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently an article in Science surveyed open access journals and found a number of distressing findings with respect to the peer review process. An overview is available at:http://www.scidev.net/global/publishing/news/sting-exposes-wild-west-of-open-access-publishing.html?utm_content=bufferb2a6d&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer The original version in Science is at:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full As the Science article acknowledges, the same results could be found if we did a survey of traditional journals as... | |
| | | | |
www.wjst.de
|
|
| | | | | But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay. For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil. | |
| | | | |
curt-rice.com
|
|
| | | | | The "sting" operation published in Science Magazine claims to highlight corruption in the open access model, but it's actually about problems with peer review - even if Scie... | |
| | | | |
koeze.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | Bezoek het bericht voor meer. | ||
