Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
osc.centerforopenscience.org | ||
| | | | |
buildingblogsofscience.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | or the day after the sting I got the embargoed copy of Science Magazine article on peer review in Open Access earlier this week, which gave me a chance to read it with tranquility. I have to say I really liked it. It was a cool sting, and it exposed many of the flaws in... | |
| | | | |
michaelschoon.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently an article in Science surveyed open access journals and found a number of distressing findings with respect to the peer review process. An overview is available at:http://www.scidev.net/global/publishing/news/sting-exposes-wild-west-of-open-access-publishing.html?utm_content=bufferb2a6d&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer The original version in Science is at:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full As the Science article acknowledges, the same results could be found if we did a survey of traditional journals as... | |
| | | | |
ubublog.sites.uu.nl
|
|
| | | | | Yesterday, Science Magazine scooped with a story on a sting with fake articles that passed peer review of 157 Open Access journals. In the article | |
| | | | |
www.scienceeurope.org
|
|
| | | Open Access to research publications improves the pace, efficiency, and efficacy of research. Find out how Science Europe is working with its members and other stakeholders to make Open Access to research publications a reality. | ||
