Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
ukhumanrightsblog.com | ||
| | | | |
bennettandbennett.com
|
|
| | | | | There have probably been times when one lawyer has had a string of habeas wins on a specific issue (we got 11.07 relief for several people after winning Ex parte Lo in 2013) but no defense appellate or postconviction lawyer has, I suspect, won six cases on different topics in the Court of | |
| | | | |
supreme.justia.com
|
|
| | | | | Lawrence v. Texas: A Texas law criminalizing consensual, sexual conduct between individuals of the same sex violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
| | | | |
notageni.us
|
|
| | | | | NOTE: I am not a lawyer, just someone who is making sense of the law for people who don't understand it. Do not use this as legal advice. Law is defined by many precedents, mostly through previous cases that created rulings. These cases create a framework of philosophical thought that forms a legal maxim over [...]Read More... from Dumb Data: Legal Doctrines & Principles | |
| | | | |
bennettandbennett.com
|
|
| | | Under section 46.05(a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code, it is a felony to possess, manufacture, transport, repair, or sell a "prohibited weapon," including a chemical dispensing device. Chemical dispensing device means a device, other than a small chemical dispenser sold commercially for personal protection, that is designed, made, or adapted for the purpose of dispensing a substance | ||
