/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.eff.org | ||
| | | | |
www.masslawblog.com
I've been belatedly reading Chris Miller's Chip War, so I'm particularly attuned to U.S.-China relations around technology. Of course, the topic of Miller's excellent book is advanced semiconductor chips, not social media apps. Nevertheless, the topic now occupying the attention of the Supreme Court and the president elect is the national security threat presented by [...] |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
prestonbyrne.com
Below is relevant enforcement correspondence sent by the UK Office of Communications, known by the Orwellian portmanteau "Ofcom," to my client, 4chan, in relation to its Online Safety Act fines, disclosed publicly in the interests of transparency, and because the First Amendment allows it. Civil rights are like non-rollover vacation days: use 'em or lose... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
knightcolumbia.org
[AI summary] This article argues that a ban on the TikTok app would likely violate the U.S. First Amendment by restricting American users' rights to receive information from abroad and requires the government to meet a high legal burden of justification. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.eff.org
Freedom of speech and association include the right to choose one's communication technologies. Politicians shouldn't be able to tell you what to say, where to say it, or who to say it to.So we are troubled by growing demands in the United States for restrictions on TikTok, a technology that many... |
|
| | | |||
