Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.masslawblog.com | ||
| | | | |
www.theguardian.com
|
|
| | | | | Justices weighed importance of security with freedom of speech in oral arguments that went over nearly an hour | |
| | | | |
knightcolumbia.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article discusses the potential constitutional implications of banning TikTok in the U.S., emphasizing that such a ban would likely violate the First Amendment due to its impact on free speech and the right to receive information. | |
| | | | |
www.internetgovernance.org
|
|
| | | | | Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling upholding the TikTok ban. The Justices clearly did not understand the full implications of this decision, and admitted as much in the opening paragraphs of the decision: "...we are conscious that the cases before us involve new technologies with transformative capabilities. This challenging new context [...] | |
| | | | |
www.nbcnews.com
|
|
| | | The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol issued a new round of subpoenas on Tuesday to former officials who worked in the Trump administration. | ||
