|
You are here |
chatgptiseatingtheworld.com | ||
| | | | |
www.theverge.com
|
|
| | | | | Meta and Anthropic both triumphed in a pair of copyright cases, but with major caveats. | |
| | | | |
www.noorjahanrahman.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently I teamed up with a colleague at Willkie, Farr & Gallagher to write a paper for GenLaw, a workshop on the intersection of AI and law, hosted by the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). You can read our essay on the GenLaw website, or below: 1. Introduction A question that has been top of mind for many proprietors of large language models (LLMs) is whether training the models on copyrighted text qualifies as fair use. The fair use doctrine allows limited use of copyrigh | |
| | | | |
www.masslawblog.com
|
|
| | | | | "Fair use is the great white whale of American copyright law. Enthralling, enigmatic, protean, it endlessly fascinates us even as it defeats our every attempt to subdue it." -Paul Goldstein __________________________ This is the second in a 3-part series of posts on Large Language Models (LLMs) and copyright. (Part 1 here) In this post I'll [...] | |
| | | | |
www.theverge.com
|
|
| | | A judge has sided with Anthropic in a copyright case that determined that the company training its AI models on purchased books is fair use. | ||