Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.noorjahanrahman.com | ||
| | | | |
www.masslawblog.com
|
|
| | | | | In the first two parts of this series I examined how large language models (LLMs) work and analyzed whether their training process can be justified under copyright law's fair use doctrine. (Part 1, Part 2). However, I also noted that LLMs sometimes "memorize" content during the training stage and then "regurgitate" that content verbatim or [...] | |
| | | | |
www.behind-the-enemy-lines.com
|
|
| | | | | [We tested the o1-pro model to give us a detailed analysis of the legal landscape around copyright and the use of copyrighted materials to t... | |
| | | | |
katedowninglaw.com
|
|
| | | | | Matthew Butterick and the Joseph Saveri Law Firm are continuing to make the rounds amongst generative AI companies, following up on their lawsuits related to Copilot, Codex, Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney with two more class actions related to ChatGPT and LLaMA, respectively. Notably, the lawsuit related to LLaMA actually predates Meta's release of LLaMA under... | |
| | | | |
manifold.markets
|
|
| | | Resolved NO. Blogpost: https://substack.com/home/post/p-169188359 In July 2025, Judge William Alsup certified a class action lawsuit against Anthropic on behalf of nearly all U.S. book authors whose works were allegedly copied for AI training. The case accuses Anthropic of copyright infringement for downloading millions of pirated books from sources like LibGen and PiLiMi, which were allegedly used to train its Claude AI models. If Anthropic loses at trial, the company could face statutory damages potentially exceeding $1.5 billion, or up to $750 billion at the theoretical maximum. A trial is tentatively scheduled for 1 December 2025. This market resolves YES if, by 31 December 2026, a U.S. court finds Anthropic liable for copyright infringement in this clas... | ||
