/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.alignmentforum.org | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
In last year's Ngo/Yudkowsky conversation, one of Richard's big criticisms of Eliezer was, roughly, 'Why the heck have you spent so much time focusing on recursive self-improvement? Is that not indicative of poor reasoning about AGI?' I've heard similar criticisms of MIRI and FHI's past focus on orthogonality and instrumental convergence: these notions seem obvious, so either MIRI and FHI must be totally confused about what the big central debates in AI alignment are, or they must have some very weird set of beliefs on which these notions are somehow super-relevant. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
Two weeks ago, I gave a lecture setting out my current thoughts on AI safety, halfway through my year at OpenAI. I was asked to speak by UT Austin's Effective Altruist club. You can watch the lecture on YouTube here (I recommend 2x speed). The timing turned out to be weird, coming immediately after the... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
Our alignment research aims to make artificial general intelligence (AGI) aligned with human values and follow human intent. We take an iterative, em... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.tomsguide.com
If there's one thing Sam Altman isn't worried about, it's the operating cost of ChatGPT. |
|
| | | |||
