Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
scottaaronson.blog | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Comment by paulfchristiano - A common view is that the timelines to risky AI are largely driven by hardware progress and deep learning progress occurring outside of OpenAI. Many people (both at OpenAI and elsewhere) believe that questions of who builds AI and how are very important relative to acceleration of AI timelines. This is related to lower estimates of alignment risk, higher estimates of the importance of geopolitical conflict, and (perhaps most importantly of all) radically lower estimates for the amount of useful alignment progress that would occur this far in advance of AI if progress were to be slowed down. Below I'll also discuss two arguments that delaying AI progress would on net reduce alignment risk which I often encountered at OpenAI. I thi... | |
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
|
|
| | | | | A high-level picture of how we might get from here to safe superintelligence. | |
| | | | |
windowsontheory.org
|
|
| | | | | [Yet another "philosophizing" post, but one with some actual numbers. See also this follow up. --Boaz] Recently there have been many debates on "artificial general intelligence" (AGI) and whether or not we are close to achieving it by scaling up our current AI systems. In this post, I'd like to make this debate a bit... | |
| | | | |
www.wildernessdweller.ca
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The author reflects on the Indian summer, the challenges of living in a wildfire-prone area, and the efforts to replace an old cookstove with a new one, while also detailing a mural project and experiences with firewood collection. | ||
