Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.molecular-matters.com | ||
| | | | |
mklimenko.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Introduction Benchmarking first Creating a library Delayed library loading Generating multiple libraries Detecting the processor architecture at runtime Using the library | |
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | | | In my previous blog post, weve discussed the static constexpr std::integral_constant idiom to specify the size of a range at compile-time. Unlike the standard, our (think-cells) ranges library at think-cell already supports compile-time sizes natively, so I was eager to try the idiom there and see how it works out in practice. namespace tc { template constexpr auto size(Rng&& rng); // runtime-size of a range, like std::ranges::size template requires tc::has_constexpr_size constexpr auto constexpr_size = ... | |
| | | | |
ashvardanian.com
|
|
| | | | | Criticizing software is easy, yet the C++ and C standard libraries have withstood the test of time admirably. Nevertheless, they are not perfect. Especially the , , and headers. The first two alone bring in over 20,000 lines of code, slowing the compilation of every translation unit by over 100 milliseconds. Most of that code seems dated, slow, and error-prone, with interfaces that are very hard to distinguish. This is not a new problem, and I don't have an exhaustive list of all the issues with STL and ... | |
| | | | |
technicaldiscovery.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | While I was on-site working for a client, one of the developers I worked with would begin each day with a brief discussion of one of the ten... | ||
