Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.greaterwrong.com | ||
| | | | |
epochai.org
|
|
| | | | | We've compiled a dataset of the training compute for over 120 machine learning models, highlighting novel trends and insights into the development of AI since 1952, and what to expect going forward. | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Preface The following text is my submission for theAI Safety Public Materials contest. In it, I try to lay out the importance of AI Safety Research... | |
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
|
|
| | | | | Two weeks ago, I gave a lecture setting out my current thoughts on AI safety, halfway through my year at OpenAI. I was asked to speak by UT Austin's Effective Altruist club. You can watch the lecture on YouTube here (I recommend 2x speed). The timing turned out to be weird, coming immediately after the... | |
| | | | |
opentheory.net
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The text presents a critique of the Foundational Research Institute's (FRI) approach to defining and addressing suffering and s-risks, with a focus on the philosophical and metaphysical challenges of functionalism. The author, Mike Johnson, argues that FRI's reliance on functionalism leads to intractable problems, such as the inability to provide a clear, disagreement-mediating definition of suffering. He outlines several objections to FRI's position, including the ineffability of suffering, intuition duels, convergence requirements, and the mapping of consciousness to physical systems. Johnson suggests that FRI should consider alternative frameworks, such as computational hierarchies, to address these issues. The text also references various so... | ||
