Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
climateaudit.org | ||
| | | | |
joannenova.com.au
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around climate change skepticism, with participants debating the validity of proxy data for the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), the role of CO2 feedback in climate models, and the influence of funding on climate research. Owen presents arguments against the MWP, citing conflicting proxy data, while Joanne counters with evidence from reconstructions. There is also a focus on the greenhouse effect, feedback mechanisms, and the credibility of climate science institutions. The exchange highlights differing perspectives on scientific consensus, data interpretation, and potential biases in climate research funding. | |
| | | | |
jennifermarohasy.com
|
|
| | | | | MOSTscientific sceptics have been dismissive of the various reconstructions of temperature which suggest 1998 is the warmest year of the past millennium. Our case has been significantly bolstered over the last week with statistician Steve McIntyre finally getting access to data used by Keith Briffa, Tim Osborn and Phil Jones to support the idea that [...] | |
| | | | |
bishophill.squarespace.com
|
|
| | | | | There is a great deal of excitement among climate sceptics over Steve McIntyre's recent posting on... | |
| | | | |
enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | ________________________________________________________ MADRID 1995: Tipping Point?-The Quest (Part II)-The Last Day (Part II) ________________________________________________________ John Houghton writes of it under the heading: Meetings that Changed the World. He may be right but not only in the way he thinks. Here we consider whether this meeting in Madrid was the moment when climate science gave way under... | ||
