Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
bishophill.squarespace.com | ||
| | | | |
climateaudit.org
|
|
| | | | | The second image below is, in my opinion, one of the most disquieting images ever presented at Climate Audit. Two posts ago, I observed that the number of cores used in the most recent portion of the Yamal archive at CRU was implausibly low. There were only 10 cores in 1990 versus 65 cores in... | |
| | | | |
jennifermarohasy.com
|
|
| | | | | MOSTscientific sceptics have been dismissive of the various reconstructions of temperature which suggest 1998 is the warmest year of the past millennium. Our case has been significantly bolstered over the last week with statistician Steve McIntyre finally getting access to data used by Keith Briffa, Tim Osborn and Phil Jones to support the idea that [...] | |
| | | | |
joannenova.com.au
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around climate change skepticism, with participants debating the validity of proxy data for the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), the role of CO2 feedback in climate models, and the influence of funding on climate research. Owen presents arguments against the MWP, citing conflicting proxy data, while Joanne counters with evidence from reconstructions. There is also a focus on the greenhouse effect, feedback mechanisms, and the credibility of climate science institutions. The exchange highlights differing perspectives on scientific consensus, data interpretation, and potential biases in climate research funding. | |
| | | | |
science2017.globalchange.gov
|
|
| | | This report is an authoritative assessment of the science of climate change, with a focus on the United States. It represents the first of two volumes of the Fourth National Climate Assessment, mandated by the Global Change Research Act of 1990. | ||
