/explore
|
You are here 
|
0xd34df00d.me | ||
| | | | |
www.cppstories.com
|
|
| | | | | For C++17 everyone wanted to have concepts, and as you know, we didn't get them. But does it mean C++17 doesn't improve templates/template meta-programming? Far from that! In my opinion, we get excellent features. Read more for details. Intro Do you work a lot with templates and meta-programming? With C++17 we get a few nice improvements: some are quite small, but also there are notable features as well! | |
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | | | In my previous blog post, weve discussed the static constexpr std::integral_constant idiom to specify the size of a range at compile-time. Unlike the standard, our (think-cells) ranges library at think-cell already supports compile-time sizes natively, so I was eager to try the idiom there and see how it works out in practice. namespace tc { template constexpr auto size(Rng&& rng); // runtime-size of a range, like std::ranges::size template requires tc::has_constexpr_size constexpr auto constexpr_size = ... | |
| | | | |
www.think-cell.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The blog post discusses techniques for implementing compile-time size calculations for range adaptors in C++ using think-cell's library, focusing on forwarding size properties and avoiding code duplication. | |
| | | | |
sencjw.com
|
|
| | | |||
