/explore
|
You are here 
|
wattsupwiththat.com | ||
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
In the first post about CO2 I included a separate maths section which showed the energy budget for the earth and also derived how much energy we receive from the sun. A comment today reminded me that I should do a separate article about this topic. I've seen lots of comments on other blogs where... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
Guest post by Antonis Christofides, Demetris Koutsoyiannis, Christian Onof and Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz On the chicken-and-egg problem of CO2 and temperature. Bare facts vs. mechanism A car is travelling at 80 km/h, and a ray of light is travelling parallel to the car, in the same direction. Its speed relative to the Earth is 300,000... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
jennifermarohasy.com
CLIMATEis complex but in an attempt to understand the effects of increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide on global temperatures simplified General Circulation Models (GCMs) have been developed and are used by the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Al Gore, in his famous movie 'An Inconvenient Truth', explained that as the concentration [...] |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
A while ago I posted a tongue in cheek thread about the old Keihl and Trenberth Earth energy budget diagram and the new shiny all colour one NASA now has on their website. Here they are again for comparison: The major difference between these diagrams is the 'surface radiation' from the surface to the atmosphere... |
|
| | | |||
