Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.sindark.com | ||
| | | | |
jembendell.com
|
|
| | | | | In this essay I offer what I think is my most comprehensive update since the Deep Adaptation paper on how I interpret the latest climate science and data. I start from the alarming acceleration of global temperatures since early 2023, surpassing predictions and challenging established climatology. I critique current climate science for its dogmatic, carbon-centric... | |
| | | | |
www.davidappell.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The history of climate change research shows that scientists have long recognized the potential impact of human activities on the climate. From the early 20th century, there were discussions about the greenhouse effect and its influence on global temperatures. Over time, as more data became available, the consensus among scientists grew that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, are a significant factor in global warming. Key milestones include the 1958 discovery of the Keeling Curve, which demonstrated the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, and the 1970s and 1980s when the scientific community began to more clearly understand the implications of these changes. By the late 20th century, the evidence supp... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has not been seriously considered. Background Recent climate change and increasingly scarce fresh water resources are two major environmental issues facing humanity. Water vapor is... | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | 6 posts published by Guest Blogger, Charles Rotter, and Anthony Watts on July 4, 2019 | ||
