Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.cppstories.com | ||
| | | | |
brevzin.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Andrzej has a great new post about the difficulty that arises when the language or the library tries to make assumptions about programmer intent. He brings up two examples of this difficulty: should CTAD wrap or copy? how should optional's mixed comparison behave? | |
| | | | |
www.bfilipek.com
|
|
| | | | | Variadic Templates from C++11 is probably not a feature that you use on a daily basis. But recently, I've come across one refactoring example where I've decided to give a try and apply variadics. Intro When I was doing some work in some old UI code I've noticed several similar lines of code that looked like that: | |
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | | | Just like regular function parameters, template parameters can also have default parameters. For class templates, this behaves mostly just like default function arguments: if you pass fewer template arguments than required, default template arguments are used to fill the remaining places. However, for function templates, it gets more complicated as template parameters for functions can be deduced by the normal function arguments. This leads to some interesting side-effects. In particular, default argumen... | |
| | | | |
www.github.com
|
|
| | | my blog, with astro. Contribute to Krayorn/blog development by creating an account on GitHub. | ||
