Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.fluentcpp.com | ||
| | | | |
blog.fahhem.com
|
|
| | | | | Posts and writings by Fahrzin Hemmati | |
| | | | |
www.cppstories.com
|
|
| | | | | For C++17 everyone wanted to have concepts, and as you know, we didn't get them. But does it mean C++17 doesn't improve templates/template meta-programming? Far from that! In my opinion, we get excellent features. Read more for details. Intro Do you work a lot with templates and meta-programming? With C++17 we get a few nice improvements: some are quite small, but also there are notable features as well! | |
| | | | |
mpark.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Can we work around the limitations of non-type template parameters? | |
| | | | |
www.cppstories.com
|
|
| | | When you see an article about new C++ features, most of the time you'll have a description of major elements. Looking at C++17, there are a lot of posts (including articles from this blog) about structured bindings, filesystem, parallel algorithms, if constexpr, std::optional, std::variant... and other prominent C++17 additions. But how about some smaller parts? | ||
