Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
vridar.org | ||
| | | | |
amateurexegete.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently I was asked by Dr. Kipp Davis if I would be willing to post a piece he has written in response to Egyptologist David Falk (Ph.D. University of Liverpool, 2015) concerning his understanding and reading of Deuteronomy 32:8-9. For those of you who may be unfamiliar with him, Dr Kipp Davis (Ph.D. University of... | |
| | | | |
bibleinterp.arizona.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This discussion centers around the debate between mythicist and historical interpretations of Jesus. Mythicists, such as Doherty and Carrier, argue that Jesus was a mythical figure, with the Gospels being symbolic or allegorical texts. They contend that the shift from Paul's view of Jesus as a celestial being to the historical Jesus in the Gospels required a sudden change in understanding, which they claim lacks historical evidence. Critics like Neil Godfrey and others argue that this transition is problematic for the myth theory and that the conventional view also faces challenges in explaining the development of the resurrection belief. The discussion touches on early Christian texts, the role of mythography, and the need for broader historica... | |
| | | | |
christianstudies.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Tim Widowfield has commented critically on a review by James McGrath, of Thomas Brodie's book 'Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus: Memoir of a Discovery' (2012). This article considers Widowfield's criticisms. Bad faith Widowfield accuses McGrath of "bad faith in dealing with mythicists", pointing to McGrath's review of Brodie's work as "a prime example".... | |
| | | | |
www.securitymagazine.com
|
|
| | | |||
