Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
bibleinterp.arizona.edu | ||
| | | | |
historyforatheists.com
|
|
| | | | | The consensus of scholars, including non-Christian scholars, is that a historical Jesus most likely existed and the later stories about "Jesus Christ" were told about him. The idea that there was no such historical person at all and that "Jesus Christ" was a purely mythical figure has been posited in one form or another since the eighteenth century, but is not taken seriously by anyone but a tiny handful of fringe scholars and amateurs. Despite this, the Jesus Myth thesis... Read More Read More | |
| | | | |
vridar.org
|
|
| | | | | Well this is bizarre. I find myself in agreement with a very substantial bulk of a recent article by Jim West at The Bible and Interpretation, "A (Very, Very) Short History of Minimalism: From The Chronicler to the Present." Jim West argues that biblical studies of the history of early Christianity | |
| | | | |
www.antwoord.org.za
|
|
| | | | | Elke dan en wan hoor ? mens die volgende: Jesus van Nasaret het nooit bestaan nie, of ons kan nie werklik weet of hy het nie. Daar is magdom populêre publikasies wat die rondte doen, die meeste daarvan op die internet, en die indruk skep dat Jesus se nie-bestaan ? historiese feit is. Dit kan | |
| | | | |
confessionalbibliology.com
|
|
| | | "The Scripture is the Word of God written in a language fit for the Church by men immediately called to be the Clerkes, or Secretaries of the Holy Ghost, 2 Peter 1:21: 'For prophecie came not in old time by the will of man, but the holy men of God spake as they were carried | ||
