Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
andymaypetrophysicist.com | ||
| | | | |
rclutz.com
|
|
| | | | | It is often said we must rely on projections from computer simulations of earth's climate since we have no other earth on which to experiment. That is not actually true since we have observations upon a number of planetary objects in our solar system that also have atmospheres. This is brought home by a paper,... | |
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | On a couple of unrelated articles on this blog, people have been asking questions about the moon. This is because a lot of people have read an articlecalled A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon from www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com that makes some confused claims. The article starts: We've been told that the earth's surface is quite a bit... | |
| | | | |
climateofsophistry.com
|
|
| | | | | I think that it is better to use a spherical Earth with the real solar input to do an energy budget, rather than a flat Earth with 1/4 the solar input like peer-reviewed and pedagogical climate science does things. It makes a difference, because with 1/4 solar input of S(1-a)/4, this equates to a solar... | |
| | | | |
jennifermarohasy.com
|
|
| | | According to American climatologist, Judith Curry, there are plenty of things to be skeptical about when it comes to Anthropogenic Global Warming, but the basic physics of gaseous infrared radiative transfer is not one of them. Dr Curry, is the chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology [...] | ||
