Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.geomblog.org | ||
| | | | |
windowsontheory.org
|
|
| | | | | Michael Mitzenmacher pointsto two posts ofSuresh Venkatasubramanian on the issue of so called "double blind reviews" (i.e., anonymous submissions) in theory conferences. In short, both Michael and Suresh think they are a good idea. I agree with much of their motivations, but, based on my experience in both non-blinded (e.g., STOC/FOCS) and blinded (e.g., CRYPTO) | |
| | | | |
blog.mrtz.org
|
|
| | | | | This is a guest post by Eric Price. | |
| | | | |
www.theexclusive.org
|
|
| | | | | There has been a lively debate recently about the review process for research paper submissions, and how to deal with the fact that double-blind review becomes more difficult when many papers are prepublished on sites like arxiv.org before submission. | |
| | | | |
juliawolffenotes.home.blog
|
|
| | | I know nothing about luxury property, save for the fading recollections of my parents' Trends magazine subscriptions I religiously leafed through cover-to-cover as a child. Since I'm always looking for ways to reconnect with my childhood, it was exciting to stumble upon a Zillow link by David S. Rose on Quora to luxury apartments in... | ||
