/explore
|
You are here 
|
bldavies.com | ||
| | | | |
www.sharonlohr.com
|
|
| | | | | Strategic voting methods assume that you know what other voters will do. Are they helpful for local elections with limited information? | |
| | | | |
zesty.ca
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This article displays and explains computer-generated visualizations comparing how different election methods (such as Plurality, Approval, Borda, Condorcet, and IRV) behave under various simulated political landscapes. | |
| | | | |
rcoh.me
|
|
| | | | | Given the level of distrust in election systems in recent years, I became curious about verifiable voting systems - systems in which you can ensure that your vote was really counted, and counted correctly. Systems in which everyone (or at least interested parties) can verify that election results precisely reflect the votes cast. The verifiable voting system I'll describe is pretty close to "regular" voting for voters. They don't need to care the election is e2e verified, they just need to vote like normal. | |
| | | | |
supreme.justia.com
|
|
| | | Bush v. Gore: Despite violating the Fourteenth Amendment by using disparate vote-counting procedures in different counties, Florida did not need to complete a recount in the 2000 presidential election because it could not be accomplished in a constitutionally valid way within the time limit set by federal law for resolving these controversies. | ||
