/explore
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | InNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong! I said: So, ifNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong is an exciting subject, you will continue to enjoy the subject for many years, because I'm sure there will be many more papers from physicists "proving" the theory wrong. However, it's likely that if they are papers "falsifying" the foundational "greenhouse" gas... | |
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | A while ago I posted a tongue in cheek thread about the old Keihl and Trenberth Earth energy budget diagram and the new shiny all colour one NASA now has on their website. Here they are again for comparison: The major difference between these diagrams is the 'surface radiation' from the surface to the atmosphere... | |
| | | | |
noconsensus.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | An important point often made by critics of climate models is that they often represent our best guess at specific phenomena. One of the biggest uncertainties in climate models is in proper modeling of atmospheric moisture. Considering that H2O is widely accepted to be the strongest of all greenhouse gasses, water is fairly important component... | |
| | | | |
wryheat.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel (jedtaz@gmail.com) In this issue we examine several articles dealing with "net zero" - the elimination of carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels. These articles show that "net zero" will have almost no effect on global temperature, but will... | ||
