Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
rclutz.com
|
|
| | | | | It is often said we must rely on projections from computer simulations of earth's climate since we have no other earth on which to experiment. That is not actually true since we have observations upon a number of planetary objects in our solar system that also have atmospheres. This is brought home by a paper,... | |
| | | | |
www.climate-skeptic.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text discusses skepticism towards anthropogenic global warming (AGW) by questioning the validity of climate models, the role of natural factors, and the reliability of data. It argues that climate models over-predict warming, rely on unverified assumptions like aerosol cooling, and may be calibrated to fit historical data rather than accurately representing climate processes. The author suggests that the models are not reliable for predicting future climate change and that the evidence for strong climate sensitivity to CO2 is insufficient to justify alarmist scenarios or policies. | |
| | | | |
patricktbrown.org
|
|
| | | | | More-severe climate model predictions could be the most accurate. | |
| | | | |
chriscolose.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | The blog Watts up with That is famous for its attempt to reinvent climate physics on Earth, and now they want to reinvent astrophysics as well. Steve Goddard, a frequent poster at WUWT, now has a couple of posts (here and here) as well as write ups by Lubos Motl, about how the extreme temperatures... | ||
