Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.eff.org | ||
| | | | |
houstonlawreview.org
|
|
| | | | | By Mackenzie Caldwell. 61 Hous. L. Rev. 411 (2023) | |
| | | | |
www.noorjahanrahman.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently I teamed up with a colleague at Willkie, Farr & Gallagher to write a paper for GenLaw, a workshop on the intersection of AI and law, hosted by the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). You can read our essay on the GenLaw website, or below: 1. Introduction A question that has been top of mind for many proprietors of large language models (LLMs) is whether training the models on copyrighted text qualifies as fair use. The fair use doctrine allows limited use of copyrigh | |
| | | | |
katedowninglaw.com
|
|
| | | | | Matthew Butterick and the Joseph Saveri Law Firm are continuing to make the rounds amongst generative AI companies, following up on their lawsuits related to Copilot, Codex, Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney with two more class actions related to ChatGPT and LLaMA, respectively. Notably, the lawsuit related to LLaMA actually predates Meta's release of LLaMA under... | |
| | | | |
www.tomsguide.com
|
|
| | | ChatGPT is getting a serious upgrade with GPT-4. This new AI model is set to bring a host of new features to the popular chatbot and numerous other apps. | ||
