Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
akrzemi1.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
www.cppstories.com
|
|
| | | | | For C++17 everyone wanted to have concepts, and as you know, we didn't get them. But does it mean C++17 doesn't improve templates/template meta-programming? Far from that! In my opinion, we get excellent features. Read more for details. Intro Do you work a lot with templates and meta-programming? With C++17 we get a few nice improvements: some are quite small, but also there are notable features as well! | |
| | | | |
mpark.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Can we work around the limitations of non-type template parameters? | |
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | | | Just like regular function parameters, template parameters can also have default parameters. For class templates, this behaves mostly just like default function arguments: if you pass fewer template arguments than required, default template arguments are used to fill the remaining places. However, for function templates, it gets more complicated as template parameters for functions can be deduced by the normal function arguments. This leads to some interesting side-effects. In particular, default argumen... | |
| | | | |
google.github.io
|
|
| | | Style guides for Google-originated open-source projects | ||
