Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
bartoszmilewski.com | ||
| | | | |
kuruczgy.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article explores the intersection of functional programming and logic through the lens of dependent types. It begins with foundational concepts like type constructors and inductive types, then delves into the Curry-Howard isomorphism, which links programs to mathematical proofs. The discussion covers how types represent propositions, functions as implications, and inductive types as proof strategies. Examples include defining logical relations like less than or equal to and equality, and demonstrating how to prove properties like universal quantification and mathematical identities. The article concludes with an overview of resources for further study in proof assistants like Coq and Idris, emphasizing the practical applications of dependent... | |
| | | | |
rachelcarmena.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Some characteristics of functional programming | |
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | Last time we worked through some basic examples of universal properties, specifically singling out quotients, products, and coproducts. There are many many more universal properties that we will mention as we encounter them, but there is one crucial topic in category theory that we have only hinted at: functoriality. As we've repeatedly stressed, the meat of category theory is in the morphisms. One natural question one might ask is, what notion of morphism is there between categories themselves? | |
| | | | |
jmanton.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | If $latex Y$ is a $latex \sigma(X)$-measurable random variable then there exists a Borel-measurable function $latex f \colon \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $latex Y = f(X)$. The standard proof of this fact leaves several questions unanswered. This note explains what goes wrong when attempting a "direct" proof. It also explains how the standard proof... | ||
