/explore
|
You are here 
|
alt-e.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Balázs M. Fekete For over three decades, the reduction of CO2 emission was the primary motivation for promoting the transition from fossil fuels to alternative energy sources. Concerns about the inevitable exhaustion of fossil fuels were considered particularly during energy crises, but these concerns died out quickly as discoveries of new fossil fuel reserves... | |
| | | | |
wryheat.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel (jedtaz@gmail.com) In this issue we examine several articles dealing with "net zero" - the elimination of carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels. These articles show that "net zero" will have almost no effect on global temperature, but will... | |
| | | | |
texasclimatenews.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The Fifth National Climate Assessment reports accelerating climate change impacts in the US, emphasizing the urgent need to speed up the transition to renewable energy and addressing widening social inequalities. | |
| | | | |
www.manhattancontrarian.com
|
|
| | | * How quickly things change. * It was only two years ago, in 2023, that I was writing posts compiling long lists of quotes from climate activists warning that all assets used for production of coal, oil and gas were about to become obsolete and "stranded." After all, wind and solar were (supposedly) cheaper and cleaner for generating electricity, which could then power anything and everything. Therefore anyone stupid enough to make further investments in producing fossil fuels would lose everything. Here is one such post from June 2023, and another from February 2023. * If you look today, you can still find predictions in 2025 that fossil fuel assets will shortly become "stranded." (Here is one from Bloomberg from March 6: "Investors Risk $2.3 Trillion of St... | ||
