|
You are here |
www.alignmentforum.org | ||
| | | | |
blog.jessriedel.com
|
|
| | | | | Here's a collection of reviews of the arguments that artificial general intelligence represents an existential risk to humanity. They vary greatly in length and style. I may update this from time to time. (This is well-paired with Katja Grace's summary of counterarguments.) Continue reading | |
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
|
|
| | | | | A high-level picture of how we might get from here to safe superintelligence. | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Eric DrexlerCentre for the Governance of AIUniversity of Oxford This document argues for "open agencies" - not opaque, unitary agents - as the appropriate model for applying future AI capabilities to consequential tasks that call for combining human guidance with delegation of planning and implementation to AI systems. This prospect reframes and can help to tame a wide range of classic AI safety challenges, leveraging alignment techniques in a relatively fault-tolerant context. | |
| | | | |
deepmind.google
|
|
| | | This has been a year of incredible progress in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research and its practical applications. | ||