/explore
|
You are here 
|
ceramic.network | ||
| | | | |
hbr.org
Blockchain networks tend to support principles like open access and permissionless use that should be familiar to proponents of the early internet. To protect this vision of open and permissionless transactions from political pressure and regulatory interference, blockchain networks rely on a decentralized infrastructure that's not controllable by any one person or group. Unlike political regulation, blockchain governance is not emergent from the community. Rather it is ex-ante, encoded in the protocols and processes as an integral part of the original network architecture. To be a part of a community supporting a blockchain is to accept the rules of the network as they were originally established. But what happens when disputes inevitably arise? Just just h... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
berty.tech
Why a DAO for Berty? (Part I) TLDR: The Berty protocol will never depend on a Blockchain. We plan to set up a DAO to secure governance of its development team. Berty 's mission is to create a protocol and applications enabling secure p2p communication between people. More simply put, it means that Berty's applications will protect confidential conversations between individuals, including in adverse political situations that might compromise the security or the availability of the internet itself. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
etherplan.com
The model is combined because it addresses the security of the operating network by using proof of work as a physical component, and the security of the social layer by using the coordination problem as a political component. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
nymag.com
A core group of Wall Street heavy hitters remain think the cryptocurrency is bound for zero. Are they onto something big - or just fighting the last war? |
|
| | | |||
