Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
30datesblog.com | ||
| | | | |
www.atrailrunnersblog.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the debate between Scott Jurek and Dean Karnazes, focusing on their approaches to ultrarunning and media attention. Scott Jurek is portrayed as a dedicated athlete who prioritizes the sport's growth and community, while Dean Karnazes is seen as a media-savvy figure who has significantly raised the sport's profile. The debate highlights differing perspectives on what constitutes success in ultrarunning—whether it's about personal achievement or broader impact. The conversation also touches on the role of media, the importance of relatability, and how both athletes have influenced the sport in unique ways. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes mutual respect and the recognition that both have contributed to the growth... | |
| | | | |
bookviewcafe.com
|
|
| | | | | Be wary of what you wish for. . . In Regency England: The descendant of adventuringdeadaristocrats, Clarissa Knightley supplements a modest inheritance by writing gothic novels that cost more than they earn. Upon learning that she has mysteriously inherited a share of an earls estate, she rashly travels to remote Gravesyde Priory, dreaming of a safe haven and welcoming family who will welcome her and her young nephew. Instead, she finds a drunken American army captain, his African servant, and ancient, s... | |
| | | | |
www.equestrianspirit.com.au
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
thingofthings.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | My friend M. Taylor Saotame-Westlake wrotea blog postduring my parental leave from this blog, in which he disagrees with Scott Alexander's The Categories Were Made For Man Not Man For The Categoriesand in true dialectical fashion I am disagreeing with both of them. No one wants to read two long blog posts about the epistemology... | ||
