|
You are here |
piszek.com | ||
| | | | |
paulgraham.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article 'How to Do Great Work' by Cal Newport explores the path to achieving significant work by emphasizing the importance of deep work, cultivating one's unique interests, and embracing curiosity. It outlines various strategies to overcome common obstacles like procrastination and fear, and highlights the value of focusing on personal passion rather than external validation. Newport also touches on the role of heuristics in finding meaningful work and the importance of persistence in the face of uncertainty. The piece concludes by encouraging readers to take initiative and try to do great work, suggesting that the potential for success is vast and that the journey is worth the effort. | |
| | | | |
wealthymatters.com
|
|
| | | | | This is an investing principles checklist from 'Poor Charlie's Almanack'.I think it bears reading at frequent intervals just to ensure we aren't doing something incredibly stupid or failing to do something basic that could better our investment records. Risk - All investment evaluations should begin by measuring risk, especially reputational Incorporate an appropriate margin of... | |
| | | | |
ryancaldbeck.co
|
|
| | | | | "Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it ... he who doesn't ... pays it." - Albert Einstein "My wealth has come from a combination of living in America, some lucky genes, and compound interest." - Warren Buffet "Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty... | |
| | | | |
mathscholar.org
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article discusses the intersection of science and philosophy, highlighting the importance of empirical evidence and the scientific method in advancing knowledge. It critiques postmodern science studies for lacking scientific rigor and credibility, referencing the Sokal hoax as a key example. The piece also touches on the contributions of non-Western societies to science and the need for diversity in the scientific community. Ultimately, it concludes that while philosophical reflection has value, it should not replace the empirical foundation of scientific research. | ||