/explore
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
www.tapatalk.com
|
|
| | | | | Skeptic Papers: Lindzen & Choi (2011) - "On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications" Lindzen-Choi 'Special T | |
| | | | |
antigreen.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | Climate models fail to agree with 5 decades of oceanic observations Could the findings of Zhang et al. mean that the projections of "almost ... | |
| | | | |
chriscolose.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently, the world celebrated an International Day of Climate Action, called "350", which is based on lifting public awareness on the need for an international climate treaty to reach a 350 parts per million CO2 level as a target threshold. I didn't really join in on the fun or follow it in any detail, but... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | by Judith Curry Climate science is sometimes characterized by skeptics as pseudoscience. Here are the arguments for why climate science is not pseudoscience. From the Wikipedia: Pseudoscienceis a claim, belief, or practice which is presented asscientific, but does not ... Continue reading | ||
