Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
vermaden.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
hack.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The provided system log is from a FreeBSD system, likely running on a dual-core processor with Intel ICH7 SATA controller, and has several hardware components such as a FireWire interface, USB devices, and multiple storage devices. The system is attempting to boot from a UFS filesystem on an ATA device. There are some warnings and errors related to the serial port and ISA bus, but the system seems to be booting successfully. | |
| | | | |
www.daemonology.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article details the author's experience of setting up a FreeBSD desktop environment, highlighting the challenges faced and the eventual success. The author spent significant time configuring hardware, installing packages, and troubleshooting issues such as touchpad responsiveness, driver compatibility, and power management. While the process was complex and time-consuming, the author concludes that FreeBSD is capable of being a viable desktop operating system, especially with the support of the FreeBSD Foundation and community efforts to document laptop compatibility. The article also reflects on the broader implications of using FreeBSD for desktop use, emphasizing the need for more developers to adopt and test laptops for this purpose. | |
| | | | |
www.davidschlachter.com
|
|
| | | | | Compatibility of FreeBSD on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480, notes and fixes (HiDPI, Trackpad, camera, etc). | |
| | | | |
michaelneuper.com
|
|
| | | Introduction If you're a Linux user, you're probably familiar with the concept of window managers and desktop environments. These programs are responsible for managing the appearance and functionality of your desktop, providing the tools and features that you need to interact with your operating system. But what's the difference between a window manager and a desktop environment? And why might someone want to turn a window manager into a desktop environment? | ||
