/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.alignmentforum.org | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
Richard Ngo lays out the core argument for why AGI could be an existential threat: we might build AIs that are much smarter than humans, that act aut... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
Update (Nov. 22): Theoretical computer scientist and longtime friend-of-the-blog Boaz Barak writes to tell me that, coincidentally, he and Ben Edelman just released a big essay advocating a version of "Reform AI Alignment" on Boaz's Windows on Theory blog, as well as on LessWrong. (I warned Boaz that, having taken the momentous step of posting... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
From a talk at UT Austin in September 2025. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
(I originally wrote this post as some rough notes on defining the alignment problem, with the intention of turning them into something more polished later. I've now started doing that, as part of a broader series introduced here. In particular, the first post in that series covers some of the same ground as section 1 of this post. It also has the same title. And some of essays in the series will draw on these notes as well.) People often talk about "solving the alignment problem." But what is it to do such a thing? I wanted to clarify my thinking about this topic, so I wrote up some notes. |
|
| | | |||
