|
You are here |
liorpachter.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
njwildberger.com
|
|
| | | | | Modern mathematics is enormously complicated and sophisticated. It takes some courage, and perhaps some foolishness, to dare to suggest that behind the fancy theories lie serious logical gaps, and indeed error. But this is the unfortunate reality. Around the corner, however, is a new and more beautiful mathematics, a more honest mathematics, in which everything... | |
| | | | |
micromath.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Continuing the theme of alternative approaches to teaching calculus, I take the liberty of posting a letter sent by Donald Knuth to to the Notices of the American Mathematical Society in March, 1998 (TeX file). Professor Anthony W. Knapp P O Box 333 East Setauket, NY 11733 Dear editor, I am pleased to see so... | |
| | | | |
a3nm.net
|
|
| | | | | List of open questions | |
| | | | |
almostsuremath.com
|
|
| | | I will give a proof of the measurable section theorem, also known as measurable selection. Given a complete probability space $latex {(\Omega,\mathcal F,{\mathbb P})}&fg=000000$, we denote the projection from $latex {\Omega\times{\mathbb R}}&fg=000000$ by $latex \displaystyle \setlength\arraycolsep{2pt} \begin{array}{rl} &\displaystyle\pi_\Omega\colon \Omega\times{\mathbb R}\rightarrow\Omega,\smallskip\\ &\displaystyle\pi_\Omega(\omega,t)=\omega. \end{array} &fg=000000$ By definition, if $latex {S\subseteq\Omega\times{\mathbb R}}&fg=000000$ then, for every $latex {\omega\in\pi_\Omega(S)}&fg=000000$, there... | ||