Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.cyberleagle.com | ||
| | | | |
blog.cyberwar.nl
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The Dutch government's response to the ECJ's April 2014 ruling on the EU Data Retention Directive outlines plans to revise national laws to align with the ruling. Key changes include requiring judicial approval for accessing telecommunications data, differentiating access based on crime severity, encrypting data, and restricting data retention to serious crimes. The government also plans to amend the ANPR data retention bill to require public prosecutor approval for accessing ANPR data. These changes aim to ensure compliance with privacy rights and EU law. | |
| | | | |
www.devever.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The Investigatory Powers Act, now passed in the UK, poses significant privacy risks by enabling the government to collect and use Internet Connection Records for surveillance, necessitating measures like Tor or VPNs to protect users. | |
| | | | |
conspicuouschatter.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | I laughed out loud when I saw the calls fromAndrew Parker, the head of MI5, for a mature debate on surveillance, in particular in relation to the draft investigatory Powers Bill (via Paul Bernal). My reading of the IP Bill is that it will result in, and perhaps intends, closing for ever the democratic debate... | |
| | | | |
soatok.blog
|
|
| | | In a recent blog post, I laid out the argument that, if you have securely implemented end-to-end encryption in your software, then the jurisdiction where your ciphertext is stored is almost irrelevant. Where jurisdiction does come into play, unfortunately, is where your software is developed and whether or not the local government will employ rubber-hose... | ||
