/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.3-16am.co.uk | ||
| | | | |
www.marxists.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text explores Zeno's paradoxes, particularly focusing on the concept of continuity and its implications for motion. Zeno's arguments, such as the 'Achilles and the Tortoise' and the 'Arrow' paradox, challenge the notion of motion by suggesting that motion is impossible due to the infinite divisibility of space and time. The text also discusses how Aristotle attempts to resolve these paradoxes by emphasizing the continuous nature of time and space, allowing for the possibility of motion despite infinite divisibility. The discussion highlights the philosophical and mathematical implications of these paradoxes and their relevance to understanding motion and continuity. | |
| | | | |
antilogicalism.com
|
|
| | | | | A real, not verbal, proof of the being of God is in any case impossible because God is not being, because being is a term which belongs to naturalism, whereas the reality of God is a reality of spirit, of the spiritual sphere which is outside what belongs to being or to supra-being. God cannot... | |
| | | | |
jaysanalysis.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text explores the philosophical and theological implications of numbers and infinities, particularly in relation to the necessity of God. It argues that numbers, especially the number one, serve as a transcendental argument for God's existence. The idea is that numbers presuppose a metaphysical unity, and without an infinite reality, predication and knowledge are impossible. The text references various philosophical and theological traditions, including Neoplatonism, Christian theology, and the works of Maximus the Confessor, to support the claim that numbers are a bridge to the infinite and thus to God. The discussion also touches on the role of the Incarnate Logos, Jesus Christ, as the foundation of all creation and the point of contact be... | |
| | | | |
aymannadeem.github.io
|
|
| | | Last September, I attended the O'Reilly Artificial Intelligence conference. Despite possessing a formal background in the field, many of the talks were unapproachable. Technical presentations commonly fall victim to dense slide decks loaded with obtuse jargon and incomprehensible descriptions. It occurred to me that "Artificial Intelligence" has become a buzzword drained of clear meaning. For these reasons, this post attempts to do three things: | ||
