Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
mathbabe.org | ||
| | | | |
geekfeminismdotorg.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | This is one woman's anonymous story about Impostor Syndrome and how it affected her geek career. It ultimately caused her to drop out of a profession she loved due to lack of confidence in her abilities, when by all objective accounts she was exceptionally skilled. This story will ring true for many women in geek... | |
| | | | |
80000hours.org
|
|
| | | | | Update April 2019: We think that our use of the term 'talent gaps' in this post (and elsewhere) has caused some confusion. We've written a post clarifying what we meant by the term and addressing some misconceptions that our use of it may have caused. Most importantly, we now think it's much more useful to talk about specific skills and abilities that are important constraints on particular problems rather than talking about 'talent constraints' in general terms. This page may be misleading if it's not read in conjunction with our clarifications. | |
| | | | |
www.thebayesianconspiracy.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The conversation discusses the importance of public engagement with government on issues like AI existential risks. It highlights how individuals can influence policy through various means, such as submitting public comments, donating to candidates, or even contributing to campaigns. The discussion also touches on the role of technology, like LLMs, in processing and categorizing public feedback, and the legal frameworks that ensure transparency and accountability in government decision-making. The overall message is that citizens have multiple avenues to make their voices heard and shape policy, even without significant financial resources. | |
| | | | |
philpapers.org
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The provided text is a collection of various academic and philosophical works, including journal articles, essays, and book preprints, covering topics such as cosmology, the philosophy of science, the anthropic principle, and the fine-tuning argument. It includes discussions on the structure of the universe, the nature of time, and the role of consciousness in science. There are also mentions of specific authors and their contributions to these fields, as well as some critiques of Bayesian reasoning and anthropic arguments. The text also contains some personal reflections and opinions on current scientific and philosophical debates. | ||
